Dunlop SP Sport MAXX - User reviews

Sort:
Piotr
3.1
After nearly 10 000 km much left tire. I travel mostly on highways 140 kmh at higher speeds. Tire reasonably well behaved in the dry, humid with heavily on gas quickly lose adhesion. The main disadvantage is the wear of the very rapid tread. I would not recommend for vehicles with a relatively high torque. Sam and 380Nm have after half of the season is the tire should be replaced. At high speeds from 160 to 200 kmh fast heat above 200 km / h, it is very hard for a civilian car tire (a run). For fans of fast and dynamic driving tips against

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:10000 - 15000km
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:VW Golf Hatchback VII 2.0 GTD (135kW)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy2
Feathering, durability1
Adi
3.1
Tire drove around 45-50 thousand for four years, after the third year of micro-cracks appeared but I took four years because the tread is about 4 mm. Fourth year I have not finished the blocks of the tread began to fall apart - 3 to 3.6 mm tread, should I roll for the winter, but from within. I noticed the crack on the side (and not a mechanical failure, sidewalk or something else). Tires when they were young is probably correct, but the noise more than the average and the worst, uneven wear, it blocks the other 2.9 mm 3.8 mm on a tire. Now suppose Vredestein Ultrac Cento, have quiet and comfortable, we'll see.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level2
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy2
Feathering, durability2
scrozer
2.6
Everything would be ok but two things, first, the noise level is quite a large wet second tragedy + rear wheel drive gives no guidance uślizg very dangerous side wet August had to sweat a lot to keep car on the ramp. Excellent tire if it is dry, but it is not enough for the money back to TOYO rubber much better.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:in terrain
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface5
The grip on wet surface2
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
DAREK
2.6
exalted the tires are nothing special (huge problems in the implementation of the Fele) and then creates a bulge. in dry conditions are still ok, but way too loud. Return of Austria by the Czech Republic, in the rain, I will fear 120 km / h, where the Czech octawie ran faster (I wonder what tires) uślizg felt the wet side.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000km
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface2
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
marko
2.6
I do not recommend the significant shock will quickly, I was expecting something better after tyrech, rain and ruts hurt in the dry is about

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level2
Bump absorption2
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
MARFIN
2.6
Not bad, but far from being the 040th Bridgestone Potenza Clashed faster than Bridgestone and kept my bmke worse. For the money it's worth.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance5
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability2
Jacek
2.6
tyres rather small, extremely fast wear only attractive price.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:in terrain + in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:BMW E46
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level2
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy2
Feathering, durability2
sb
2.6
B.duzo tower. about 100k miles per year. This is my first tire of this company. I am disappointed by the quality of the tires. Tires in all tests Very good fall ADAC particular the # 1 position. This is not true. After a season of wear. I drove a few seasons before Honda Accord with tires (BF Goodrich Profiler GF) and the tires are light years better to drive fast. This is what I did for BG violated the laws of physics and Dunlop Tires I drive like a retiree. The tire is not suitable for high speed driving, the car tilts from side to side, poor braking. The only advantage was quiet and comfortable driving for Polish holes.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:in terrain + in the city
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
2.5t 225km
2.4
Tire after almost 15 miles to exchange, howls August can not stand (very strong). At the beginning of driving parameters were fine, but now the drama. The braking distance is about 140 more than 11m contiwintercotact ... Tire terribly wyzabkowana after two seasons, I do not feel safe on it. When the dynamic traction jumps, flips. Feel a high resistance to oil, high aquaplaning water. Even in the case does not meet my expectations because deforms August At annoying low profile. Różwnież evil dampens vibrations. Generally discouraged. The only good thing in the tire and it looks very good cornering stability, but unfortunately it does not compensate for other defects.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:in terrain + in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level1
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy1
Feathering, durability1
robertinio
2.2
I rode a lot of tires, and I can say that these are really the only thing on which I rode better Toyo PX4 and Uniroyal RainSport 1 - except that these tires are softer mixture faster zdzierały. Dunlop a good compromise between the right tire and sport for everyday driving. It should be noted a very good performance in excess of 200 km / h high speed and good surprise braking on wet surfaces.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:2000 - 5000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:Ford Mondeo 4/5 drzwi
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
Driving comfort
Noise level5
Bump absorption5
Other
Tyre appearance5
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability4
Total rating of the tyre
3.9
3.9
4.0
-
3.4