01 699 4151
01 699 4151
Today:
7 till 13
Click if you
live in UK
Tyres
Car tyres
Off-Road tyres
Cargo tyres
Motorcycle tyres
Snow chains
By season
Summer tyres
Winter tyres
All-season tyres
Popular brands
Michelin Tyres
Bridgestone Tyres
Continental Tyres
All manufacturers
Tyre ranking
Tyres by vehicle details
Wheels
Alloy wheels
Steel wheels
TPMS pressure sensors
Fit the tyre to the rim
Basket
Oponeo
Rating and Reviews
Tyre Reviews Bridgestone ER300
Bridgestone ER300 - User reviews
24
25
26
Sort:
Date added ascending
Date added descending
Comfort increasingly
Comfort decreasingly
Cost increasingly
Cost decreasingly
Rating ascending
Rating in descending order
Road rising
Road declining
Terrain increasingly
Off-road in descending order
Tomek
3.3
If someone is looking for tires for a quiet ride around the city, you can buy with confidence and be happy. The tire is quite difficult, consumes very slowly. I do not recommend if you like poupalać. The tragedy is not there, but definitely worth buying something better. Keep quite predictable, there is a sudden loss of grip and it's praises, even in the rain - I would say it is one that is designed to run in the rain tire. I flew around the 150km/hw literally a wall of rain and I had no soul on his shoulder, good to drive.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
2000 - 5000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
Honda Civic Hatchback VI 1.6 16V
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
5
lucco
3.2
I do not understand why they have such a high score. Very noisy on dry tires, but wielding great. In the wet is the drama.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
in terrain
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
Honda Accord Sedan
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
5
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
2
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
4
coolmobil
3.2
These have tyres of April 2011. Conti actually hunted for sport, but for lack of other options vest. Tire in road works decently, although I think it is strong enough. Requires warm most severe turn. Leave the wet, in my opinion, the drama - not a patch on the second Conti Sport Another thing that I have a heavy foot and drive my car to the front has more than 400 Nm Overall, a decent tire, but strikes on his knees.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
5000 - 10000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
2
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
Volvo V50
3.1
I've had Michelin HP and ContiSportContact3 two were much better, much better stability when driving over 170 km / h Adhesion to dry or better for more aggressive starts with 1 and 2 are able to activate the system . The worst thing about these tires is that the depreciation of the inequality is horrible! rubber is hard as concrete, driving comfort is tragic (excluding motorways). When you want to get rid of the gum. I bought tempted by the price promotion as a sale, and unfortunately, it was preferable to make a better gum. 205/50/17 tires
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
2000 - 5000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Volvo V50 Kombi I 2.0 D
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
5
Bump absorption
1
Other
Tyre appearance
-
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
vengador
3.0
Welcome. My tyre size is 195/50R15, Honda Civic 3d 1998. Tyres were fitted on the front. I do not recommend on wheels with a width of less than 6.5 inches. I have 5,5 and it's a match! Benefits - tyre stops on the line for both, dry and wet! There is no problem in the ruts, erases water better than winter tyres. They are really comfortable. Better than: ToyoT1R, Falken 512 and 912, 185/60R14 Yokohama C drive Cons - terrible on the corners - it is their biggest drawback, in my opinion. Overall Rating 4, I recommend to people who drive safely and who want to have a quality tyre with an excellent wet and dry breaking. I do not recommend for high-speed corners.
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
Honda Civic V 1.5i
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
1
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
2
Feathering, durability
3
mateo
3.0
Generally an average tyre, for a lot of money. Much better to choose Continental. Much cheaper and much better handling. Somehow it works on dry asphalt, there is a tragedy on wet, there is no question of any stronger braking, ABS works immediately, even when you lightly touch the brake pedal. The same with acceleration - on dry road stays, on wet asphalt, stronger gas pressure and wheels lose traction, unfortunately. When cornering, it starts throwing away quite early and you have to keep that in mind. Where, although on winter tires I enter calmly at corners at a speed of 90 km / h, on Brigestone it is unfortunately 75 km / h, a maximum of 80.
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Toyota Avensis Sedan
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
4
luk
2.6
Tires got with the car from the factory. Previously, most of the time mounted on the GY excellence. The tire is good stops on dry pavement, holding properly in the corners, the important thing right torque when overtaking. Nothing special what you can expect from tires and at the same time so I could say goodbye to it. Disadvantages: Powerful! For GY Excelancow not even compair which is even stronger than the winter gripow Ultra is total defeat AQUAPLANNINGU CHAMPION! 1.5 ton car with three people on board with a thin layer of water on the asphalt is already drifting speed 100-110 km / h embarrassment. Summative: Zedra the trash as soon as you can and look for another. Or are performed on summer zeson southern Europe.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000km
Place of use:
in terrain + in the city
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
VW Passat 3C
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
1
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
Mario
2.6
As the tires loaded with a new car, or the appearance or quality. Even on dry roads may be normal for them to go, but it's a real wet slip and this fort. Abrasion hopeless after driving 40000 km were not suitable for use in practice, and now has landed in the garbage again. I recommend avoiding a large bow and do not suggest that the opinions that are very good because many are already convinced that this is a very poor and heavily overestimated tires. And now it's time for something good, and this year, the Passat spring mount Dunlopach SP Sport 9000 and the rest of the works in August slide on wet surfaces.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
in terrain
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
2
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
1
Feathering, durability
1
Lee
2.6
Tires on a dry run well, are soft. Sides look totally embarrassing, but tires 205 rounded and a total area of tire contact with the road is low, such as the sides of the tire 175 per turn. If you want a sporty look of the car is not to buy these tires because they look like the old grandfather. Despair look exactly like a ball.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000km
Place of use:
in terrain
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
1
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
majonez_zo
2.6
judge Poor 4 tires because some wet WOZA in tight turns on dry a little better (4 +), we can say that we stick to the asphalt, but they tend to slip when cornering at speeds higher (around 120 or more). Regards belly
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
in terrain
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
24
25
26
Total rating of the tyre
3.9
Comfort
3.8
Road
4.2
Off-road
-
Cost
3.7
Buy