Michelin PRIMACY HP - User reviews

Sort:
Piotr
3.7
For such a respectable brand tires are average at best. Just in dry conditions, quiet and comfortable. However, the average barely damp. I have a fairly high 340 Nm This tire compared to the previous Bridgestone ER 300 Ecopia and Continental ContiPremiumContact 2 couples paled on wet asphalt, both when accelerating, braking or arc. To be honest, if they were relatively expensive, do not feel confident enough with them. The advantage of this tire is quite low attrition. Bridgestone and Conti consumed in the eye. Perhaps one of the other models such as the Michelin Primacy 3 or Energy Saver + are better in the wet.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:5000 - 10000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:Toyota Avensis Sedan
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level5
Bump absorption5
Other
Tyre appearance5
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability4
jean-marie
3.5
very good tire but overpriced and background as snow, for a tire with a speed rating of 270km / h which costs more than 200 € is innadmissible!

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:in terrain + in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Citroen C4 Grand Picasso 1.6 HDI
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance-
Frequent failuresYes
Economy
Economy1
Feathering, durability1
Cube
3.4
I drove at 35 ° C for 9 hours and bursting occurred. The tear was as lon could do anything with. I do not recommend!

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failuresYes
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability3
Wrocławiak
3.4
I Michelinki on the front, they told me that my gumiarz. All is well in the tire has less than 120km / h, the noise level increases dramatically. I Mondeo TDCI engine noise, but the tires are harder. The next is not shit! And the people most likely to sell and install something calm.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:5000 - 10000km
Place of use:in terrain + in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
Driving comfort
Noise level2
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
arkady
3.4
Tires purchased at the instigation of the seller. HP is small but aggressive driving is certainly not appropriate. The first thing that stands out in the urinary traction even on small corners skids the tire and we inequality is a total failure. But I think it is great for the beginning and for long distances quickly. The very correct inhibition. But cornering behavior is unacceptable. Escape appearance, but the bands wider bearing.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level5
Bump absorption5
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability5
Mariusz Lisowski
3.4
Tires revelation - if it does not surprise me that you like the snow in March 2008. Sypnie last winter and halogen exchange left. And in the parking lot at a speed of 5 km / h but I'm not complaining, because this is definitely not winter tires, even on some of the summer, I have not had such problems . Also recommended tires.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability4
Piotr
3.4
tyres great exercise, but as soon as the price in August this confrontation. if I have to buy new expensive. Pilot tested previously used Michelin - Pilot much better

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:Vectra C caravan
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
Driving comfort
Noise level5
Bump absorption5
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy1
Feathering, durability1
Łysy
3.4
Unfortunately, I have not had the impact on the type of tires on the purchase of a new vehicle. Treatment soft tires (only), a more aggressive driving causes a significant shift and integrating power ESP reception. The worst thing is that when you turn on the limit of adhesion, when you see that the car has a lot can (and many ford can) tire begins to let go and, unfortunately, is no longer fun. In summary: good tire braking (both wet and dry), as quiet (but it could for me by the size of a strong enough buzz), as comfortable - but receives a lot of fun lead, and as usual with Michelin horribly expensive. I do not recommend - for much less money is much better tires. So they try to consume the Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:10000 - 15000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:Ford S-Max
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance1
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
sk
3.4
In general, very good for normal cruising, but not recommended tire! to drive more aggressively.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level5
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability4
EdekZ
3.4
215 and the tire width braking retard limit, in a known curvature of me is much smaller than the width H Nokianach 195th .. I know a place, I know that speed, how many car can ... All in all a bit shocked as I was driving the same speed of a car on these tires on a flat road (Amory new effective, etc.) I went to turn on them ... and 3cm wider than Nokianów (cars weight almost identical) ... Do not buy these tires again ...

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:2000 - 5000km
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface5
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance2
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability4
Total rating of the tyre
3.9
4.0
3.9
-
3.8
Buy