Firestone WINTERHAWK - User reviews

Sort:
rboss
2.6

Translation

I was expecting something better, on average tires, which did not give me a complete sense of security. On the other hand, were in Krynica, Zakopane, Szczyrk, Solina, across the great snow and wrote this estimate, then maybe they are not so bad ;-)

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:in terrain
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
The grip on snow and slush3
Driving comfort
Noise level2
Bump absorption2
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
tomasso
2.6

Translation

Encouraged by the relatively low and the opinions of the users price, I decided to buy these tires. After leaving the oponiarzy noticed very easy to lose grip on the asphalt damp! Compared to a year precipice qualitative Pirelli P6. We'll see how it will be on the snow ... But on a rain tire did not work.

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000km
Place of use:in terrain
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface1
The grip on snow and slush3
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Paweł
2.6

Translation

Witam.Zdecydowanie recommend. Good relations for money. Mounted in a taxi. Used in London and the surrounding sticks. The only drawback is the noise level, but only after passing the 130 - 140 kmh

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
The grip on snow and slush3
Driving comfort
Noise level2
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
c.m.
2.6

Translation

Shoot a fatal wet ... In this category deserves the lowest rating ... Other properties at a relatively good level. Due to the great difference of opinion between the categories I suggest investing in a different brand. By large fluctuations in charakterystce product can be acquired costly problems.

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000km
Place of use:in terrain
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface1
The grip on snow and slush3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Jarek
2.6

Translation

Works well with the free ride and quiet, the sooner they are simply weak. I did Oberwacje generally 60 km / h are OK, 70 - 80 sqm ugly wet, 50-60 slippery surface very bad, 90-100 floor dry and cold are OK. The pluses - they are quiet.

Additional information

Distance made:5000 - 10000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
The grip on snow and slush3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Maciek
2.6

Translation

I wonder how these opinions "great revelation", etc? Sam guided by the opinions here and we actually expect revelations, and probably can not be seen (or maybe it's just a lack of winter? ;). I compare with the Pirelli Toyota Yaris and I must admit that Pirelki were certainly better - kept the snow, ran great during the summer (yes, I rode on them 30 years because I do not want to change) and Winterhawki a little bit in the snow (not Well, it was slippery in addition to ABS and Yariska Nubira is not). In my subjective and unprofessional, but honest opinion, the tire has no visible defects, but there is no great revelation - is probably good value for money, but to be honest I rolled for the year Kormoranach and did not notice any significant difference, but again, other self - Matiz. Now that I bought Firehawki also guided by the opinions here. Let's see if that does not impress me in the future, I chose high-end equipment and stop reading reviews. Greetings to all the honest assessment.

Additional information

Distance made:10000 - 15000km
Place of use:in terrain
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
The grip on snow and slush3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
yaro
2.6

Translation

I will say that before the tires had Michelin already know 100% that Michelinami more likely to opt for a different brand of tires, the best for me, I was in a Honda Civic Michelin and therefore 165,000 is a very good product but firebrick summer and winter in August is not quite true.

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
The grip on snow and slush3
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
raj
2.6

Translation

I bought tires guided by opinions on this page. Unfortunately, I was expecting something better after them to my previous tires (cormorants s100) that drove five winters just do not wash. Overall, for me, it is slippery and the snow and the rain.

Additional information

Distance made:5000 - 10000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface2
The grip on snow and slush3
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
grizzly bear
2.6

Translation

While it is normal that the temperature hovering around 2 degrees in the wet, the tires are less efficient than a year, it does not matter, but if not, I would not recommend these tires. The snow can be. Slush already the worst. the dry braking too quickly lose grip. To summarize - there is nothing to get excited about this tire.

Additional information

Distance made:5000 - 10000km
Place of use:in terrain + in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
The grip on snow and slush3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
76er
2.6

Translation

Hi, when it comes to driving in the snow, and for that, after all these tires were developed, it did not feel too confident. The shift was strongly felt and the car does not lead to trust.

Additional information

Distance made:2000 - 5000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
The grip on snow and slush3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Total rating of the tyre
3.6
3.8
3.7
-
3.7
Buy