01 699 4151
01 699 4151
Today:
7 till 13
Click if you
live in UK
Tyres
Car tyres
Off-Road tyres
Cargo tyres
Motorcycle tyres
Snow chains
By season
Summer tyres
Winter tyres
All-season tyres
Popular brands
Michelin Tyres
Bridgestone Tyres
Continental Tyres
All manufacturers
Tyre ranking
Tyres by vehicle details
Wheels
Alloy wheels
Steel wheels
TPMS pressure sensors
Fit the tyre to the rim
Basket
Oponeo
Rating and Reviews
Tyre Reviews Firestone MULTIHAWK
Firestone MULTIHAWK - User reviews
12
13
14
Sort:
Date added ascending
Date added descending
Comfort increasingly
Comfort decreasingly
Cost increasingly
Cost decreasingly
Rating ascending
Rating in descending order
Road rising
Road declining
Terrain increasingly
Off-road in descending order
koss
3.4
I use this brand of tires for many years and I am happy.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
Wysocki Ireneusz
3.4
I chose this brand because I auta.Przejechałem on new 50000 km on them and I'm happy. tyres excel without zarzutu.Zaczyna be heard above 120km/h.Ogólnie I zadowolony.I recommend.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
only outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
kotowski
3.2
Well and you do not need to advertise the tire is not to advertise in August
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
10000 - 15000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
1
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
raczej spokojny użytkownik szos:)
3.1
For those on a (not phlegmatic) calm driving style would be a good choice, while the "athletes" behind the wheel may disappoint.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
10000 - 15000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
Daewoo Lanos Sedan
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
Marek
3.0
Well remove surface irregularities. I think for the price, this is a good choice. But it could interfere with high levels of noise - I think because I drive a car for more high-end tires, which are much quieter (Nokian Z-).
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
2000 - 5000km
Place of use:
only outside the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
Patrick Cipriano
3.0
had much better as Continental, Goodyear, these seem like GOODRIDE (Chinese shit)
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
2000 - 5000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
-
Frequent failures
Yes
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
4
zimi
2.9
Genralnie I have no objection too. The tire operates. I am very disappointed that the adhesion. For a car is slipping in my opinion. But it could, I think so. The first time I own a car and thus actively used.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
10000 - 15000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
Jacek
2.8
This is the end of their life, and passed on them a lot. Just walk wear, it is sensational tires for those who think they are frugal. Why "seems"? Well, because when they are the fuel consumed kulaniu lot really tough. Besides, I had never really trust them, especially on wet roads could unpleasantly surprised. Personally, I feel that the company is too lavish Firestone silica, which makes the rubber will not be in conflict, but harden and become dangerous quickly.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Nissan Micra Hatchback I 1.0
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
5
Ryhoo
2.8
A major drawback is the significant susceptibility to hydroplaning (at higher speed, even causing instability of the vehicle), in addition to the normal wet traction, suddenly my engine 90 hp can cause tearing adhesion even on the second run. In addition, after 5 years of tires already microcracks with age, for example, winter tires Dunlop I had seven years of a single crack ...
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
VW Golf Hatchback IV 1.9 TDI (66kW)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
2
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
Radek
2.6
tyrech led to only 200 km so my opinion is quite the first impression. I chose Firestone, because I have this brand new car, only that I had previously 702nd Firehawk I think Firehawki were a little better, but maybe a short distance, so przejchałem state . The tires are actually a bit głośnawe and I must confess that are hard (feel the holes in the road). I put the winter tyres site (Fulda Montero) and what? the summer tires are better in the corners than winter tires! winter tyres flown on the roundabout on the corner, and on the same Firestonach weeks later, he flew roundabout ... no comment. I bought them too, because they were cheap, and I think for the price, it is a good buy. I thought the Uniroyal, but ultimately chose Firestone, and I do not know how I did - see during the tear.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
4
12
13
14
Total rating of the tyre
3.8
Comfort
3.7
Road
3.9
Off-road
-
Cost
3.9
Buy