01 699 4151
01 699 4151
Today:
7 till 13
Click if you
live in UK
Tyres
Car tyres
Off-Road tyres
Cargo tyres
Motorcycle tyres
Snow chains
By season
Summer tyres
Winter tyres
All-season tyres
Popular brands
Michelin Tyres
Bridgestone Tyres
Continental Tyres
All manufacturers
Tyre ranking
Tyres by vehicle details
Wheels
Alloy wheels
Steel wheels
TPMS pressure sensors
Fit the tyre to the rim
Basket
Oponeo
Rating and Reviews
Tyre Reviews Dunlop SP Sport 2000
Dunlop SP Sport 2000 - User reviews
4
5
6
Sort:
Date added ascending
Date added descending
Comfort increasingly
Comfort decreasingly
Cost increasingly
Cost decreasingly
Rating ascending
Rating in descending order
Road rising
Road declining
Terrain increasingly
Off-road in descending order
cresida
2.7
In my opinion, after driving 40 miles. tires are not good for the average driver, hard enough and low grip in the wet, but the sporty driving has improved hence the name, and probably the producers of the case.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
10000 - 15000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
2
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
4
tallaff
2.6
I admit, I was surprised with the user reviews. I ride hard, often rapidly (about 200) and the considerable distance, tires are in good condition. Found no tumor, or something similar, and the average consumption is in my opinion. However, there is one drawback that I can say. This tire is not suitable for driving in the wet. Maybe others do not know, but with my driving style and suspension sports car, it is very sensitive. When I see reviews itself is wet where high strength and low ocenioniona ... I feel that we are talking about completely different tires.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
zdzislaw
2.6
After the above (small) distance I see no signs of wear, good for driving (and braking) to dry a little listen to 130k m / h, well above 160 km / h, but it is not seem particularly bad, hopeless on snow and ice - you can not get used to the rain and puddles riding carefully so as not to see the problem, probably a little better than the previous Pirelli P6.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
4
Artur
2.6
Unfortunately I can not put too good as tires, 40000 km driven on them, and already a few weeks ago opinion, I decided that I will mention the tires with new ones. For szystkich bubbles powychodziły tires, one slightly cracked. In terms of grip in dry conditions this car will dance wet Plateau Sticky like a ballerina on the ice. Overall, I would not recommend
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
2
Bump absorption
2
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
wrc
2.6
I tested the tire in rather poor amateur rally fails in the dry and in the wet, it is already a nightmare! A much better is the Michelin Pilot or Bridgestone Dunlop 2000 is suitable for taxi drivers than people who love to drive fast but safely
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
5000 - 10000km
Place of use:
in terrain
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
Chester
2.6
In fact, they have only one drawback, and so totally not suitable for driving on wet roads. During aggressive driving in rainy weather conditions you have to remember that when you brake a few meters, we get beautiful. Overall, I would not recommend to those who like to drive fast, and so that the tire can literally "drive".
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
AS
2.6
Tire leaves a good impression. Well now on the road at high speeds. High comfort ... if it is not noise. During the rain should be cautious in the ruts - tires low discharged large amounts of water.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
in terrain
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
2
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
5
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
4
Voyager
2.6
Very good tire in the dry, wet it must be careful because it keeps well, but after a certain limit przekroczenu suddenly lose traction. Quickly lose the tread. And the same size and in the ruts terribly profile. But still much better than what I had previously Pirelli!
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
in terrain
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
2
Feathering, durability
2
Andrzej
2.6
low, especially in the wet (do not drain), rigid, noisy but good sychym leads, unfortunately, is not always dry
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
in terrain
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
2
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
Marcin
2.6
Excellent dry, good tires in the wet, but very poor in the ruts and puddles ...
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
10000 - 15000km
Place of use:
in terrain
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
5
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
4
5
6
Total rating of the tyre
3.1
Comfort
3.3
Road
3.2
Off-road
-
Cost
3.2
Buy