Continental ContiPremiumContact 2 - User reviews

Sort:
Aaron
3.2
We bought these tyres and mounted them on our Volkswagen Polo 9N3, 2009 and later we fitted them to Vauxhall Adam Slam 1.4. Currently, we have them in our Vauxhall Mokka 1.6, 2013. I can say that we tested these on many different vehicles! Having such knowledge I started to write reviews on the Internet just to help other people to choose the best product for their cars. The tyres are good in dry conditions, they are very quiet and provide good adhesion. However, they aren’t so good in rainy weather. I had a lot of tyres and cars in my life so it’s important for me what tyres I’m driving on. I know how to choose tyres. I learned a lot about performance, tread patterns, wet grip, braking distance and fuel economy. I put attention to UE labels. Generally speaking, I’m satisfied with quality of these Continentals. However, the tyres on our Vauxhall Mokka worn out quicker than I expected (after doing 16,000 miles). The tyres had 2.5 mm of tread left. They had around 6-8 mm when we bought the car. The overall performance on dry surfaces is good but not great. I like how they look like (they look good on a car). The tread pattern is really interesting and provides good grip. They could be a bit less expensive. All in all, they are premium tyres and you pay for quality. I don’t know if they are worth their price but their quality is undeniable. I had these several times. No it’s time for me to try something new.

Additional information

Distance made:5000 - 10000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Vauxhall Mokka SUV I 1.6 ecoFLEX FWD (85kW)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface2
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance5
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Seba
3.1
Well hold on a sharp turn. It is terribly wet slips. Less humid which keeps evil and quickly wear out. Overall, I would not recommend in economic terms.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000km
Place of use:only outside the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface5
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy2
Feathering, durability1
ucciu de lecce
2.4
after km.34.000 forced to replace due to wear, especially in the loss of traction in the wet, after about km.500000 driver in my life there are tires with lower yield equal and sometimes higher price.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:in terrain + in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:Ford Focus Station Wagon
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface2
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance1
Frequent failuresYes
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Bart
2.4
My car is Alfa Romeo 156. I’ve done approximately 30,000 miles during a season. The previous tyres I had were Fulda EcoControl. I decided to buy a set of these Continentals because of various test results. I must say that after this purchase I stopped to belive in tests. The tyres are good but I’m not sure if they are worth their price as Fuldas were much cheaper and similar in terms of quality. Perhaps their durability is higher but it’s difficult to say as I need some time to check that. When they were new, their overall performance was perfect but after some time they started to loose the most significant characteristics. All in all, the tyres are still pretty cool. The only annoying thing is their squeaking when they are new (it’s getting better after several hundred miles). The fuel consumption is low as well as the rolling resistance. Their braking distance is better than I expected. I would fairly say that their quality is visible. They are really good on wet roads. Despite their price, I think the tyres are good and If somebody is looking for top quality, the Continental PremiumContact 2 is a good choice.

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000km
Place of use:in terrain + in the city
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface2
The grip on wet surface2
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
BeRek
2.0
In 2010, I bought a party where the factory was founded, these donuts and I must admit that the other does not, I drive fast enough and I have not had any situation "dramatic". On wet or dry behave perfectly, so far I've done on them and slowly 65000 km alliance to buy new tires and it will certainly conticontactpremium! I highly recommend these tires!

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Ford Fiesta Hatchback
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface1
The grip on wet surface1
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability4
mario
1.5
only good aquaplaning on wet and dry road holding bad

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000km
Place of use:in terrain + outside the city
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface2
The grip on wet surface1
Driving comfort
Noise level2
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance1
Frequent failuresYes
Economy
Economy1
Feathering, durability1
Total rating of the tyre
4.1
4.1
4.3
-
3.8