01 699 4151
01 699 4151
Today:
7 till 13
Click if you
live in UK
Tyres
Car tyres
Off-Road tyres
Cargo tyres
Motorcycle tyres
Snow chains
By season
Summer tyres
Winter tyres
All-season tyres
Popular brands
Michelin Tyres
Bridgestone Tyres
Continental Tyres
All manufacturers
Tyre ranking
Tyres by vehicle details
Wheels
Alloy wheels
Steel wheels
TPMS pressure sensors
Fit the tyre to the rim
Basket
Oponeo
Rating and Reviews
Tyre Reviews Continental ContiPremiumContact 2
Continental ContiPremiumContact 2 - User reviews
27
28
29
Sort:
Date added ascending
Date added descending
Comfort increasingly
Comfort decreasingly
Cost increasingly
Cost decreasingly
Rating ascending
Rating in descending order
Road rising
Road declining
Terrain increasingly
Off-road in descending order
Aaron
3.2
We bought these tyres and mounted them on our Volkswagen Polo 9N3, 2009 and later we fitted them to Vauxhall Adam Slam 1.4. Currently, we have them in our Vauxhall Mokka 1.6, 2013. I can say that we tested these on many different vehicles! Having such knowledge I started to write reviews on the Internet just to help other people to choose the best product for their cars. The tyres are good in dry conditions, they are very quiet and provide good adhesion. However, they aren’t so good in rainy weather. I had a lot of tyres and cars in my life so it’s important for me what tyres I’m driving on. I know how to choose tyres. I learned a lot about performance, tread patterns, wet grip, braking distance and fuel economy. I put attention to UE labels. Generally speaking, I’m satisfied with quality of these Continentals. However, the tyres on our Vauxhall Mokka worn out quicker than I expected (after doing 16,000 miles). The tyres had 2.5 mm of tread left. They had around 6-8 mm when we bought the car. The overall performance on dry surfaces is good but not great. I like how they look like (they look good on a car). The tread pattern is really interesting and provides good grip. They could be a bit less expensive. All in all, they are premium tyres and you pay for quality. I don’t know if they are worth their price but their quality is undeniable. I had these several times. No it’s time for me to try something new.
Additional information
Distance made:
5000 - 10000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Vauxhall Mokka SUV I 1.6 ecoFLEX FWD (85kW)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
5
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
Seba
3.1
Well hold on a sharp turn. It is terribly wet slips. Less humid which keeps evil and quickly wear out. Overall, I would not recommend in economic terms.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000km
Place of use:
only outside the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
5
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
2
Feathering, durability
1
ucciu de lecce
2.4
after km.34.000 forced to replace due to wear, especially in the loss of traction in the wet, after about km.500000 driver in my life there are tires with lower yield equal and sometimes higher price.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
in terrain + in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
Ford Focus Station Wagon
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
1
Frequent failures
Yes
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
Bart
2.4
My car is Alfa Romeo 156. I’ve done approximately 30,000 miles during a season. The previous tyres I had were Fulda EcoControl. I decided to buy a set of these Continentals because of various test results. I must say that after this purchase I stopped to belive in tests. The tyres are good but I’m not sure if they are worth their price as Fuldas were much cheaper and similar in terms of quality. Perhaps their durability is higher but it’s difficult to say as I need some time to check that. When they were new, their overall performance was perfect but after some time they started to loose the most significant characteristics. All in all, the tyres are still pretty cool. The only annoying thing is their squeaking when they are new (it’s getting better after several hundred miles). The fuel consumption is low as well as the rolling resistance. Their braking distance is better than I expected. I would fairly say that their quality is visible. They are really good on wet roads. Despite their price, I think the tyres are good and If somebody is looking for top quality, the Continental PremiumContact 2 is a good choice.
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000km
Place of use:
in terrain + in the city
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
2
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
BeRek
2.0
In 2010, I bought a party where the factory was founded, these donuts and I must admit that the other does not, I drive fast enough and I have not had any situation "dramatic". On wet or dry behave perfectly, so far I've done on them and slowly 65000 km alliance to buy new tires and it will certainly conticontactpremium! I highly recommend these tires!
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Ford Fiesta Hatchback
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
1
The grip on wet surface
1
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
4
mario
1.5
only good aquaplaning on wet and dry road holding bad
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000km
Place of use:
in terrain + outside the city
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
2
The grip on wet surface
1
Driving comfort
Noise level
2
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
1
Frequent failures
Yes
Economy
Economy
1
Feathering, durability
1
27
28
29
Total rating of the tyre
4.1
Comfort
4.1
Road
4.3
Off-road
-
Cost
3.8
Buy