Dębica Presto
Very good value
Opinion Krzynio:
4.1
Very good value for money. The tyre is not inferior to the previously used Yokohama C.Drive. It seems to grip less well on wet surfaces, but maybe that's just a subjective assessment because I tried not to skid for safety reasons. I gave the rolling resistance a rating of 4 because after a longer drive (after warming up) the car does not slide down a small hill, e.g. at traffic lights, as it does on cold tires, although it is difficult for me to say whether this is the tire's fault or, for example, the bearings. I cannot rate the durability, on Yokohamas I did about 50 thousand km, on Dębica Furio 80 thousand and I have not reached the marker yet. On these I did only 15 thousand and they look almost like new. Fuel consumption on the route (road about 95 km/h, highway 140 km/h) 5.8 - 5.9 l/100km, so for my Mazda they're very economical.
more »
Dębica Passio 2
Tire for cars of the city as the most recommended.
Opinion Bartek:
3.9
I bought a set of Passio 2's after one season on Passio 1's that had "run out" and were very average. I am currently finishing my 5th season on these tyres (total annual mileage ~15,000). The assessment is most positive, the tyres are predictable both on dry and wet pavement. Of course, we are talking about city cars with limited power - do not expect miracles from the Passio 2 in more powerful constructions :) Tough tyre, resistant to gravel roads, potholes, etc. The downside is that they quickly lose grip - sometimes when it rains you have to be careful when starting in the wet, e.g. on a left-hand turn, not to be stuck with the wheels spinning. The tyre life is high, generally a very decent tyre for the money, but you have to remember which cars it was made for.
more »